Category: 
August 21, 2008
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
I have heard that people can view many things at a far away distance without being there. Is it true? I am interested in remote veiwing. I want to learn this art, but of course it is only possible if it exists.
This is absolutely not true. Some comments:
1. If this has been the subject of some multibillion-dollar investment by the government, why have we not heard something about it?
It is very hard to keep very large things a secret. They could not keep the atomic bomb a secret. What makes you think that they could keep this a secret?
2. If this works, why don't Wall Street firms, with their phenomenal resources, use it?
3. Under what principles would it work? There is no known physical laws that would allow this to be true.
4. If this is true, why is this not the subject of intense interest and scrutiny in academia, in the US and other places?
5. If this is true, why have we not caught Bin Laden? Why did we not know about the WMD program in Iraq?
6. Looking at the summaries and reviews of Joseph McMoneagle's book on remote viewing on amazon.com mentioned above is instructive. At least half of the reviewers were disappointed (even those who believe in remote viewing) because there was no step by step set of instructions describing how to do remote viewing in this book. This is in spite of the fact that this is what this book claims to do!
In addition, McMoneagle claims that the Stargate project for remote viewing is some sort of ultra-classified government program for spying. If this is true, McMoneagle would never be allowed to publish this book, and would be in prison right now for writing it. Instead, I am sure that any members of the US intelligence community, if they are even aware of this book, probably can hardly contain their laughter. I find it hard to believe that this program was ever a serious program or yielded any benefits, if it even existed.
7. Isaac Asimov did some testing of remote viewing, and found that 46% of the predictions produced by those using remote viewing were incorrect (see reference).
8. James Randi looked into 65 claims by remote viewers, and found that only 1 was not obvious, or available in reference books.
Any way you look at this, remote viewing is too fantastic to be true. No one can tell you how it works. No one can prove to you that it does work. There is no evidence that anyone is using it, only unsubstantiated rumors.
It just sounds romantic, so a lot of people want to believe it. The more interesting question is, why do people insist on believing such twaddle?
Horaayy..there are 13 comment(s) for me so far ;)
i don't know. but it sounds freaky
References :
It does not exist.
References :
Has never been scientifically verified - and they've tried.
References :
Just buy a pizza and then eat it while you stare into the mirror.
References :
where your from mars.no
References :
Absolutely not. This is referred to as astral projection or astral viewing and it is a pseudo-science, it is a scam and created to fool the gullible.
References :
That sounds like fiction to me. You can only see things that are within your range of vision. Of course, you can imagine things that are farther way, but you can't actually see them.
References :
It is possible, and a book has been writen by the world's best remote viewer. Here's the link. It shows you everything you need to know.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1571741593/qid=1141681897/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/103-7459994-9805446?s=books&v=glance&n=283155
The government has known about the effectiveness of remote viewing for some time now. They even had a program called "Stargate", which the author of the book was a part of, where they used remote viewers to spy on the Russians.
References :
no these kinda things are just tricks to make people fool and surprise
References :
Just like darn near anything 'paranormal' the scientific community has a hard time believing it and most results are are left up to interpretation which is the root of the problem in trying to scientificly 'prove' it.
anyway, the 'art' of remote viewing is a reality. The goverment has spent billions in research over the years, and still employs remote viewers. Is the information 100%? 6 times outta 10, no.. but it's close enough to be agaist the odds, and therefore something to look into.
References :
Only for a few people.
References :
This is absolutely not true. Some comments:
1. If this has been the subject of some multibillion-dollar investment by the government, why have we not heard something about it?
It is very hard to keep very large things a secret. They could not keep the atomic bomb a secret. What makes you think that they could keep this a secret?
2. If this works, why don't Wall Street firms, with their phenomenal resources, use it?
3. Under what principles would it work? There is no known physical laws that would allow this to be true.
4. If this is true, why is this not the subject of intense interest and scrutiny in academia, in the US and other places?
5. If this is true, why have we not caught Bin Laden? Why did we not know about the WMD program in Iraq?
6. Looking at the summaries and reviews of Joseph McMoneagle's book on remote viewing on amazon.com mentioned above is instructive. At least half of the reviewers were disappointed (even those who believe in remote viewing) because there was no step by step set of instructions describing how to do remote viewing in this book. This is in spite of the fact that this is what this book claims to do!
In addition, McMoneagle claims that the Stargate project for remote viewing is some sort of ultra-classified government program for spying. If this is true, McMoneagle would never be allowed to publish this book, and would be in prison right now for writing it. Instead, I am sure that any members of the US intelligence community, if they are even aware of this book, probably can hardly contain their laughter. I find it hard to believe that this program was ever a serious program or yielded any benefits, if it even existed.
7. Isaac Asimov did some testing of remote viewing, and found that 46% of the predictions produced by those using remote viewing were incorrect (see reference).
8. James Randi looked into 65 claims by remote viewers, and found that only 1 was not obvious, or available in reference books.
Any way you look at this, remote viewing is too fantastic to be true. No one can tell you how it works. No one can prove to you that it does work. There is no evidence that anyone is using it, only unsubstantiated rumors.
It just sounds romantic, so a lot of people want to believe it. The more interesting question is, why do people insist on believing such twaddle?
References :
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1571741593/qid=1141681897/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1
http://skepdic.com/remotevw.html
1. Just look into the CIA and US Military 20 yr remote viewing program and its available FOIA docs and you will clearly see that time after time a psi effect was recorded by many scientist form differing universities and labs. Some of these docs are available on my website.
2. As to your other questions - people and Wall st making money etc…
see here: http://edition.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/07/09/celeb.psychic/index.html
3. We dont know why it works - it just does.
4. It was scrutinised by the US military, labs and the intel services including CIA, and the DIA for over 20 years?
5. maybe they don’t really want to - but there are FOIA docs showing how remote viewing was used in the first Gulf war against Saddam.
6. As i said - research first - Stargate was a real program and was declassified in 1996 - there are 86,000 FOIA documents about it you can purchase and read thru covering its 20 year history and use.
7. So what - others have done experiemnts and found it works!
I and others make money form remote viewing predictions - there are example on my website - go see for yourself.
8. James Randi - yep the same person who runs a $1M dollar challenge that no one can win
Its true, it works, the US intel and military used it for at least 20 years, I use it to help the US police find missing persons, other use it for many things - really look into it and you’ll see there is evidence there.
daz